165 lines
8.0 KiB
Markdown
165 lines
8.0 KiB
Markdown
|
# Explanation: Understanding LLMs, Prompt Engineering, and ARAI AI
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**ARAI AI Agents** leverages advanced **Large Language Models (LLMs)** to produce non-repetitive, context-aware content through various strategies, including **prompt chaining**. This document provides a brief history of AI, explains how LLMs differ from other AI approaches, covers tokenization and prompts, and explores two popular prompt engineering techniques—_Prompt Chaining_ and _Chain-of-Thought (CoT) Prompting_. We’ll also highlight ARAI’s approach to orchestrating these methods.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Table of Contents
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1. [A Brief History of AI](#1-a-brief-history-of-ai)
|
|||
|
|
2. [How LLMs Differ from Other AI Approaches](#2-how-llms-differ-from-other-ai-approaches)
|
|||
|
|
3. [Tokens, Prompts & Generation](#3-tokens-prompts-generation)
|
|||
|
|
4. [Two Paths to Take: Prompt Chaining vs. Chain-of-Thought Prompting](#4-two-paths-to-take-prompt-chaining-vs-chain-of-thought-prompting)
|
|||
|
|
5. [Limitations of LLMs](#5-limitations-of-llms)
|
|||
|
|
6. [How ARAI AI Agents Leverage LLMs](#6-how-arai-ai-agents-leverage-llms)
|
|||
|
|
7. [Conclusion](#7-conclusion)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 1. A Brief History of AI
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1. **Symbolic AI (1950s–1980s)**
|
|||
|
|
Early AI largely relied on **rule-based** or “expert” systems, manually encoding logic rather than learning from large datasets.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
2. **Machine Learning (1980s–2000s)**
|
|||
|
|
Statistical algorithms (decision trees, SVMs, etc.) gained traction, but they often required extensive feature engineering and couldn’t handle nuanced language tasks well.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
3. **Deep Learning (2010s)**
|
|||
|
|
Neural networks scaled to many layers (“deep”) ushered in a new era of success in fields like vision, speech, and basic NLP tasks, yet still had limitations with long-range text dependencies.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
4. **Transformers & LLMs (Late 2010s–Present)**
|
|||
|
|
The **Transformer** architecture ([“Attention Is All You Need”](https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762)) revolutionized NLP. **Large Language Models (LLMs)** like GPT (OpenAI), BERT (Google), and others leverage massive datasets, enabling more context-aware and flexible text generation.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 2. How LLMs Differ from Other AI Approaches
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1. **Context Handling**
|
|||
|
|
LLMs excel at understanding and generating text with long-range context, unlike older models that quickly lost track of previous content.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
2. **General-Purpose Functionality**
|
|||
|
|
Traditional AI is usually _task-specific_, whereas modern LLMs can _adapt_ to various language-related tasks via well-structured prompts.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
3. **Few-Shot & Zero-Shot Learning**
|
|||
|
|
LLMs can tackle tasks with minimal examples, a huge leap from older machine learning methods requiring large labeled datasets for each new domain.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
4. **Fluency & Creativity**
|
|||
|
|
Transformer-based models produce coherent, contextually rich text that often feels natural and human-like.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 3. Tokens, Prompts & Generation
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 3.1 Tokenization
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- **What Is a Token?**
|
|||
|
|
A **token** can be a sub-word, punctuation, or symbol. LLMs process text sequentially in tokens.
|
|||
|
|
- **Context Window**
|
|||
|
|
LLMs only have a finite **context window** (e.g., 2k–32k tokens). If your conversation exceeds that window, older context may be dropped or truncated.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 3.2 Prompts
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- **Prompt as an Instruction**
|
|||
|
|
A **prompt** is the text or instruction you give an LLM.
|
|||
|
|
- **Prompt Engineering**
|
|||
|
|
The art of shaping prompts to achieve specific outputs is called **prompt engineering**. Effective prompts may include role instructions, examples, or constraints.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 4. Two Paths to Take: Prompt Chaining vs. Chain-of-Thought Prompting
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**Prompt engineering** is the process of writing prompts that guide **artificial intelligence (AI) models** (LLMs) to generate desired outputs. Two popular techniques often used to improve the quality and reliability of responses are **Prompt Chaining** and **Chain-of-Thought (CoT) Prompting**. Each technique offers unique advantages and suits different types of tasks.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 4.1 Prompt Chaining
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- **Definition**
|
|||
|
|
In **Prompt Chaining**, you break down a complex task into a series of smaller prompts. Each prompt’s output feeds into the next, ensuring the model carries forward relevant context and partial results.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- **Use Case**
|
|||
|
|
Ideal for:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- **Sequential tasks** (e.g., multi-episode stories, multi-step transformations).
|
|||
|
|
- **Maintaining context** over multiple posts or interactions.
|
|||
|
|
- **Structured workflows** where each step refines or expands the content.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- **Example**
|
|||
|
|
1. **Prompt 1**: “Generate a character backstory.”
|
|||
|
|
2. **Prompt 2**: “Using the backstory, outline a 5-episode arc.”
|
|||
|
|
3. **Prompt 3**: “Write the first episode’s script referencing the outline.”
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
This approach is central to how **ARAI** orchestrates episodes and seasons while preventing repetitive content.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 4.2 Chain-of-Thought (CoT) Prompting
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- **Definition**
|
|||
|
|
**CoT Prompting** encourages the model to write out its reasoning steps before giving a final answer. Instead of simply asking for a solution, you instruct the LLM to “show its work” in a structured or step-by-step explanation.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- **Use Case**
|
|||
|
|
Best for:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- **Complex problem-solving** (math, logic puzzles, or multi-faceted questions).
|
|||
|
|
- **Diagnostic tasks** (where seeing intermediate reasoning is valuable).
|
|||
|
|
- **Ensuring correctness** by revealing potential errors in the reasoning chain.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- **Example**
|
|||
|
|
1. Prompt: “Explain how to solve this math problem step by step, then provide the final answer.”
|
|||
|
|
2. The model outputs a _reasoning chain_ (hidden or partially visible) and a final solution.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
In short, **CoT** is more about unveiling the reasoning process. **Prompt Chaining** is about splitting tasks into multiple sequential steps. **ARAI** primarily uses _Prompt Chaining_ but can combine CoT for more in-depth reasoning within each step.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 5. Limitations of LLMs
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1. **Hallucinations**
|
|||
|
|
LLMs may invent details when unsure, which can lead to plausible-sounding but incorrect answers.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
2. **Context Window Constraints**
|
|||
|
|
They can only handle a limited token count at once. Exceeding that limit truncates older parts of the conversation.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
3. **Lack of True Understanding**
|
|||
|
|
Despite generating sophisticated text, LLMs do not possess consciousness or genuine comprehension.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
4. **Bias & Ethical Concerns**
|
|||
|
|
LLMs can reflect biases present in their training data. Caution is advised, especially for public-facing content.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
5. **Prompt Quality**
|
|||
|
|
Output is only as good as the prompt. Poorly structured requests yield suboptimal results.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 6. How ARAI AI Agents Leverage LLMs
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**ARAI AI Agents** harness LLMs with a focus on **Prompt Chaining** for narrative-driven content. Some highlights:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1. **Story-First Content**
|
|||
|
|
ARAI uses a _TV show or cinematic model_—seasons, episodes, scenes—to maintain overarching context.
|
|||
|
|
2. **Chained Prompts**
|
|||
|
|
- Each step (episode, scene, or post) references the preceding step’s output, ensuring continuity and preventing repetition.
|
|||
|
|
3. **Multi-Agent Collaboration**
|
|||
|
|
- ARAI can integrate multiple agent personalities, each guided by specialized prompts or constraints.
|
|||
|
|
4. **Chain-of-Thought (Optional)**
|
|||
|
|
- For specific logic or puzzle-based tasks, ARAI can enable CoT to capture the LLM’s reasoning process more transparently.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 7. Conclusion
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Modern **Large Language Models** give us _unprecedented flexibility_ in text generation. By employing **Prompt Chaining** and, when necessary, **Chain-of-Thought Prompting**, we guide LLMs toward more coherent, context-rich outputs that serve both creative and analytical tasks.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**ARAI AI** exemplifies these methods by:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- Building multi-episode narratives that avoid redundancy.
|
|||
|
|
- Utilizing carefully structured prompts to maintain story context across seasons.
|
|||
|
|
- Embracing or bypassing CoT as required by the complexity of each scenario.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
> **Next Steps**:
|
|||
|
|
>
|
|||
|
|
> - Check out our [How-To Guides](./how-to-guides.md) for environment setup and configuring your LLM keys.
|
|||
|
|
> - Dive into [tutorials](./tutorials.md) for hands-on practice creating your first story-driven agent.
|
|||
|
|
> - See the [Reference](./reference.md) docs for ARAI’s APIs and modules.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**Happy prompt engineering with ARAI AI!**
|